Israel, Jordan and "Making the Desert Bloom."

The San Remo Convention claim is usually made by Arabists (and Jordanian Nationalists) Jordan got the short end of the stick, and has less arable land than Israel. Not only is this not true, but it shows the truth of Israel's miracle. 

So, lets compare, shall we?

Jordan is about 3 times the size of Israel, and 22% of it is Arable land. That is 7,588.9 Square Miles. Jordan is widely in disrepair and the amount of Arable land has not changed much.

Israel is 1/3rd the size of Israel, but 40% of its land is Arable. This was not the original situation; Judea and Samaria and Gaza have arable areas, and in the original "two-state solution" where Israel gets roughly all the land controlled today by it, the PLO and Hamas, Israel had a lot of agricultural land. Still, the British government state in the 1937 White Paper, used to refuse Jewish immigration to Mandate Palestine, the British government claimed only 2 million people could stay alive in the region without mass starvation (and that was risking it.) 

Today, 2 million is roughly the number of Arab-Israelis.  

What Israel was to have from the UN mandate was overwhelmingly majority desert, and Israel was marred by violence everywhere during the War of Independence. But nevertheless, it is the only country which has had a net gain of trees from 1900 to 2000, and that continues to now. While the Iranian-backed "featured snippet" on Google (and low below it, on a website called "Decolonize Palestine" which, as previously reported, claims Jews created Communism to kill Goys), there is objective proof "Making the Desert Bloom" isn't a "Zionist Colonialist *Myth"-Its reality. Zionists have been saying it because its true. 

(These accusations of myths feed into the claims of a Jewish genocide of Arabs and a "Palestinian People." The idea most Arabs in Eretz Yisroel today moved into the region after Zionism is a lot less believable when you think it was a thriving land before; and the idea of a larger Arab population in the region makes it easy to ignore the fact the Arab population of Israel, Judea-Samaria and Gaza between pre-war '48 and 2022 has grown 9 times over.)

Now, taking 60% of what is in 2022 Arable land in Israel, and adding all of Jerusalem plus parts of Judea and Samaria Area C, how many square miles of Israel are arable (drumroll, please...)

3,340. 

So, is Israel a conspiracy which was made to undermine Jordan? Or do Arab nationalists provocateurs and their allies lie to make Jordan seem Arabs seem like a victim of Israel's existence?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Middle-East-O-Pedia: Black Panthers

The Black Panthers were a right-wing terror group and military arm of Fatah. They were founded in 1988, but waned in activity since the 90's thanks to weakening by the Israeli government. It is unknown their relationship with Fatah today, but are still connected.
Read more

The Political Compass of Jewish American NewsSources

Image
  The Purpose of this Chart (researched and crafted by me for you, fair reader) is to show you concrete information on the Jewish American Communities main sources of information and how they report according to ideas of being more pro-government, religious or cultural (or plain secular), or generally economically and governmentally left or right. Every paper shown above is amazing in its own way. Truly. Even if they (like all newspapers) have bias. In general , they also do better on the axis not shown above; showing the majority of good news in the world versus the minority bad which merits discussion to correct. I'll note this is more in comparison to most American news sources than correctly showing the discrepancy. Notes for Nerds (of which their are a lot):  To be considered a Jewish American Newsite for the Purpose of this Compass, you must pass four Criteria:    1. Have a primarily American Jewish Readership or cover Judaism in America, and be explicitly Jewish (culturally
Read more

The Orwellian Nature of the Anti-Israel World's History of "Palestinian."

"Palestinians", as it is defined today, is a new term. You can think whatever you want about Israel today, or the Levant or if Pluto is a planet, but that is objectively true. Objectively, Palestinian referred originally to anyone living in the territory of modern Israel and the West Bank, including some Northern Syria. It was objectively a new term as used today, to refer to Arabs in the land of Israel. So, why is it wikipedia, the Palestinian Authority, the "Squad" as they call themselves, and tens of millions of people around the world deny the basic history (shown with proof below)? Is it not the most egregious example of Orwellian history changing a word, once referencing anyone in the area, to now reference a people which were not a people until the 1940's (and at best seem to only be binded together as the ones which aren't Israel and not under their neighbors), most of which had family move into the area of modern Israel during the 1800's yet are
Read more